![]() |
Smalltalk/X WebserverDocumentation of class 'JavaScriptFunctionWithBreakpoints': |
|
Class: JavaScriptFunctionWithBreakpointsInheritance:Object | +--ExecutableFunction | +--CompiledCode | +--Method | +--JavaScriptFunction | +--JavaScriptFunctionWithBreakpoints
Description:support for line-Breakpoints instances of me are created when line-breakpoints are placed. The only function I serve is to provide the originalMethod information, and an easy way to check for having a breakpoint (is breakpointed). Caveat: very stupid - had to repead the definition from MethodWithBreakpoints. Probably it is a stupid idea, to implement breakpointed methods this way (by inheritance), instead of having some attribute in the method (such as in an annotation). May someone change that?... Related information:Tools::BreakpointService Instance protocol:accessing enumerating
|
|
ST/X 7.1.0.0; WebServer 1.663 at exept.de:8081; Mon, 04 Aug 2025 16:50:41 GMT
|